Romney’s Tax Returns Show $21.6 Million Income in ’10
By NICHOLAS CONFESSORE and DAVID KOCIENIEWSKI
Published: January 24, 2012
Mitt Romney and his wife, Ann, made $27 million in 2010. They held millions of dollars in a Swiss bank account and millions more in partnerships in the Cayman Islands. His family’s trusts sold thousands of shares in Goldman Sachs that were offered to favored clients when the storied investment house first went public. The couple’s effective federal tax rate for the year worked out to 13.9 percent, a rate typical of households earning about $80,000 a year.
Emmanuel Dunand/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
Mitt Romney delivered a speech on Tuesday morning at National Gypsum Company in Tampa, Fla. His campaign is calling it a "pre-buttal" to President Obama's State of the Union address.
Multimedia
Related
Putting Candidates' Tax Rates in Perspective (January 24, 2012)
Inside the Romney Tax Returns(January 24, 2012)
The Caucus: Boehner Offers His 2 Cents on Romney's Tax Rate(January 24, 2012)
New York Times/CBS News Poll: Poll: Partisan Split Over Tax Policies (January 24, 2012)
Election 2012 iPhone App
A one-stop destination for the latest political news — from The Times and other top sources. Plus opinion, polls, campaign data and video.
Readers’ Comments
"It's distressing that when we read about our public servants these days, it more often than not has to do with their private equities and not their service to the public. "Argun, Brooklyn, NY
Yet the hundreds of pages of tax documents released by Mr. Romney’s campaign on Tuesday morning did not readily reveal any elaborate financial legerdemain or exotic tax shelters. What Mr. Romney’s returns illustrated, instead, was the array of perfectly ordinary ways in which the United States tax code confers advantages on the rich, allowing Mr. Romney to amass wealth under rules very different from those faced by most Americans who take home a paycheck.
Those differences leapt to the front of the national debate on Tuesday when President Obama — whose family’s income was less than a tenth of Mr. Romney’s in 2010 but whose effective federal rate was double — called for higher taxes on the wealthy in his State of the Union speech.
Mr. Romney’s tax returns were posted on his campaign’s Web site on Tuesday morning after escalating pressure from the other Republican candidates, Democrats and even supporters, some of whom attributed his loss in South Carolina’s Republican primary last weekend to his shifting and tentative responses to questions about his wealth, tax burden and overseas investments.
The 547 pages of documents included 2010 federal income tax returns for the Romneys, the couple’s estimated 2011 return and returns for their charitable foundation and two blind trusts established in their names, as well as a trust established for their children.
The couple paid about $3 million in federal taxes on an adjusted gross income of $21.6 million, the vast majority of it flowing from myriad of stock holdings, mutual funds and other investments, including profits and investment income from Bain Capital, the private equity firm Mr. Romney retired from in 1999.
The couple reported no wage earnings in 2010. But in a conference call with reporters on Tuesday, Mr. Romney’s campaign counsel, Benjamin L. Ginsberg, said that Mr. Romney and his wife collected more than $7 million worth of Bain profits in 2010.
That money — about a quarter of the couple’s income during the last two years — came in the form of so-called carried interest. It would be taxed not as deferred regular income, but at the lower 15 percent rate normally reserved for long-term capital gains, thanks to federal tax rules that have sparked intense debate in recent years.
Mr. Obama and others have argued that carried interest should be taxed at the rates which normally apply to income earned by people providing services, topping out at 35 percent. If Mr. Romney’s carried interest income in the last two years had been taxed at that higher rate, he would have owed about $4.8 million in federal taxes, roughly $2.6 million more than he would typically be assessed under current rules.
And like most of the wealthy, the Romneys paid only a tiny sliver of their income in payroll taxes, which cut heavily into the weekly paychecks of wage earners but is barely a blip on the returns of the rich. While payroll taxes eat up 6 percent of the income of Americans earning the national median income of $50,221, Mr. Romney and his wife paid just one-tenth of 1 percent of their income in payroll taxes.
Mr. Romney’s 2010 returns also suggest he may have paid far less taxes the previous year. The 2010 return shows the family made estimated tax payments for 2009 of $1,369,095. To avoid penalties, estimated tax payments must be at least 110 percent of the taxes owed the prior year. Assuming that is what he paid, his federal tax bill for 2009 would have been $1,244,632, far less than in 2010.
Mr. Romney and other Republican candidates have not only opposed higher taxes on the wealthy, but also favor maintaining or expanding the relatively low rates for capital gains and interest income, breaks that Republicans and others favor as a way to spur investment and reward risk-taking but which critics say have fed the growing wealth gap.
Those reductions in taxes on investments began with a deal between Bill Clinton, a Democrat, and Mr. Romney’s chief rival for the Republican nomination, Newt Gingrich, then speaker of the House. They accelerated under President George W. Bush, who cut taxes on dividends and capitals gains to their current levels, and survived a push by Mr. Obama and the Democratic majorities in Congress in 2010 to restrict tax advantages for financial managers. Indeed, if Mr. Romney became president and won approval of his own tax proposals he would pay less in federal taxes than he would under current law.
Mr. Gingrich has proposed even steeper reductions, which would nearly eliminate Mr. Romney’s federal income tax burden. During the 15-minute conference call, Mr. Ginsberg argued that the documents should settle any lingering questions about Mr. Romney’s investments and tax burden. Mr. Romney’s tax return was “complicated — and it is also fully transparent,” he said.
But the documents suggest that the Romneys or the lawyer overseeing the family’s blind trusts, R. Bradford Malt, may have been sensitive to the political implications of at least some aspects of the family’s finances.
In 2010, about $3 million of the family’s assets were held in a UBS bank account in Switzerland. Mr. Malt said that the account complied with all Internal Revenue Service reporting requirements and that the family had paid all applicable taxes on the interest earned by those assets.
“It is a bank account,” Mr. Malt said. “Nothing more, nothing less.”
But the account was closed in 2010, at a time when UBS was at the center of a Justice Department investigation regarding tax evasion by American clients.
Mr. Malt also said that the Romneys’ holdings in the Cayman Islands, Bermuda, Ireland and other low-tax countries did not provide any reduction in their United States taxes.
Bain Capital, as well as Mr. Romney’s I.R.A., have significant holdings in funds based in the Caymans and other low-tax countries. But Mr. Malt said that Mr. Romney’s income is taxed at the same rate it would be if the funds were in the United States.
The campaign declined repeatedly to answer questions about whether holding some of Mr. Romney’s retirement investments in overseas vehicles may have allowed him to avoid a levy known as the unrelated business income tax, or UBIT.
The Romneys’ family foundation, the Tyler Charitable Foundation, made gifts to more organizations in 2010 than it had previously. The largest amount paid that year, as in the past, went to the Mormon Church. Mr. Bush’s presidential library in Dallas received the second-largest grant, $100,000.
Mr. Romney, a Mormon, tithes a portion of his income to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. In 2010, his tithe appeared to include about $1.6 million in cash contributions.
Other assets held in the Romneys’ trusts were managed by Goldman Sachs, which invested the Romneys’ wealth in companies including Apple, Research in Motion and Comcast.
One notable sale Goldman made on the Romneys’ behalf in 2010 was 7,000 original public offering shares of Goldman Sachs, purchased in 1999.
The Goldman shares were issued at $53 each. The family trusts held onto those shares for more than a decade, as the firm prospered, but unloaded them in December 2010, at a time when the Goldman name had became synonymous with Wall Street excess and Mr. Romney was known to be considering a second bid for the White House.
The shares sold for around $161 apiece for a total price of about $1.13 million.
This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: January 24, 2012
A previous version of this article misstated the number of I.P.O. shares of Goldman Sachs that the Romneys bought in 1999; it was 7,000 shares, not 6,000. The article also misstated the share price and total when the shares were sold in 2010; the Romneys sold them for $161.45 apiece, or $1,130,123.87.
