samedi 28 janvier 2012

Wales, the Greece of Britain...

The Welsh Economy Slips, but London Cushions the Fall

Andrew Testa for The New York Times

A mountain view of Blaenau Ffestiniog, Wales, an industrial town that has seen better days.

BLAENAU FFESTINIOG, Wales — This could have been Britain’sGreece.

Infusions in the billions of pounds keep fading towns like Blaenau Ffestiniog alive.

Andrew Testa for The New York Times

A functioning slate quarry in Blaenau Ffestiniog is a reminder of the town's past.

Andrew Testa for The New York Times

The artist David Nash hopes his sculpture will be part of a plan to draw tourists.

For decades, Wales, like Greece, has been plagued by persistent deficits and uncompetitive industries. Yet unlike Greece, which teeters on the edge of bankruptcy and faces a possible exit from the euro zone — the 17 European Union members that use the euro — this semi-autonomous country suffers no threat of running out of cash or being forced to abandon the British pound, which it shares with other members of Britain’s own political and monetary union: Scotland, Northern Ireland and England.

This year Wales, including this fading slate mining town in one of Britain’s poorest counties, is expected to receive about £14.6 billion, or $22.6 billion, from the central government. The money is used to cover what Wales cannot raise itself from taxes and borrowing.

Most people do not think of Britain — home to many of Europe’s most outspoken euro skeptics — as having a monetary union. But it does, and these money transfers are the essence of what makes Britain’s common currency a success in knitting together a collection of regions and historically separate countries with different languages, cultures and economic profiles.

As a sovereign nation, Greece has had free rein to recklessly spend and borrow, the result of which is its near-bankrupt condition. Wales, by comparison, has limited tax and borrowing capabilities, and the money it gets each year to fulfill its spending needs comes automatically from the British treasury.

And therein lies the lesson for the euro zone: until it can find a way to ensure that its poorer nations can manage their fiscal affairs, countries like Greece and Portugal that run constant budget deficits will become increasingly dependent on transfers from richer countries like Germany. For Britain, such a transfer is accepted as the cost of keeping the union together.

By contrast, Europe’s richer nations, led by Germany, resist institutionalizing any substantial flow of money toward Greece apart from a modest amount of development aid long made available to Europe’s poorer regions for specific projects. In Germany, the notion of a so-called transfer union, which many economists see as essential to any enduring common currency, is still firmly resisted.

As a result, Greece, along with Portugal and Ireland, is dependent on negotiating individual bailouts with the European Union and the International Monetary Fund in a torturous process that risks collapse at almost any turn.

“Wales is part of a fiscal union, a nation state in which the political culture is cohesive enough to legitimize these fiscal transfers,” said Kevin Morgan, an economist at Cardiff University who is an expert on Britain’s north/south divide. “But what works at the national level breaks down at the supranational level.”

As in the euro zone, there are questions even within Britain about the value of its union. But they are driven more by political and cultural divisions than monetary ones. The Scottish national leader Alex Salmond is pushing for a vote that might provide Scotland independence from Britain, while remaining vague on whether the Scots should then abandon the pound to adopt the euro.

In terms of economic contribution to their respective monetary unions, both Wales and Greece are roughly equal, packing a fairly weak punch of about 3 percent. Both are heavily dependent on public spending. Wales is even poorer than Greece, generating agross domestic product equal to $23,100 per person, compared with Greece’s G.D.P. of $26,900 per person.

Despite the similar economic profiles, Britain is far more generous with Wales than the European Union is with Greece. Compared with the nearly $23 billion in funds London sends to Wales every year, which is used to bolster local tax revenue and pay for services like health care and education, Greece receives on average about 2.9 billion euros a year in structural funds, or $3.7 billion, devoted mostly at specific development projects.

It is not just Wales that benefits from British transfers. In 2011, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland together received £54 billion, or $83.7 billion, a sum that is almost twice the level of British military spending.

The yearly transfer payments total about 3.5 percent of Britain’s G.D.P.

Robert A. Mundell, the Nobel Prize-winning Canadian economist whom many see as the intellectual father of the euro, cited a willingness to move money from richer areas to poorer ones as a crucial component of any nation or group of nations bound together by a successful monetary union, pointing to Britain and the United States as examples. The other central requirements of an effective currency zone, he argued, were free trade in goods and services, the ability of workers to move easily from one place to another, and roughly similar economic cycles.

Blaenau Ffestiniog (pronounced Blay-NIGH Fes-TIN-ee-og) presents a stark tableau of just how such a currency area works to soften the wide disparities even within a relatively small and cohesive country like Britain.

More than a century ago, Blaenau was a thriving industrial town of more than 10,000 people, churning out slate slabs that roofed houses the world over. The residue now covers the hills that surround the town, casting a pall that mirrors its economic condition. Since undercut by cheaper slate varieties from Spain and China, the mines no longer provide many jobs, and the town’s steadily shrinking population is now below 5,000.

It is a proud settlement where virtually everyone is bilingual. Conversation at work and in and around town is mostly in Welsh rather than English.

While more people are leaving Greece as the economy worsens, greater language and cultural barriers make it harder for Greeks to move easily to Germany or Italy than for a resident of Blaenau to settle in Birmingham or London, perhaps never to return.

A quarter of the town’s population receives unemployment benefits and the average income is a mere £10,600, half the national average. The town lost its last dentist five years ago.

“There are just too few people chasing too few jobs,” Phil Rogers, a slate mason, said one evening recently as he sipped a pint of ale on the town’s threadbare main street. Mr. Rogers says he is earning no more today than he did 10 years ago, but while times are hard and he often traps squirrels and rabbits to supplement his diet, he says he manages to get by.

“The welfare state — it’s pretty good, isn’t it?” he said with a wink.

But such a safety net does not come cheap. Of the money flowing to Wales this year, 42 percent is destined to pay for health and social services, including free prescription drugs and home day care for the elderly, a critical support for towns with a rapidly aging population like Blaenau’s.

The town is embarking on an ambitious project to make it more appealing to tourists, including the construction of a mountain biking complex. Local officials hope that the investments will reverse the town’s fortunes, economically as well as psychologically.

“People see themselves in a declining town,” said Bob Cole, the chairman of the local group here that has pushed for the project. “We are saying, ‘Look, we are now on the up.’ ”

While the European Union contributes substantially to such projects, the transfer payments from Britain’s more prosperous south keep the town alive as its tax base shrivels and demand for welfare services increases.

For some here, that dependence is galling — especially now as Scotland’s bid for independence gathers steam.

“We have a better understanding of what to do with our money than a bunch of millionaires in London,” said Paul Thomas, the town official who represents Blaenau at the local county seat and who is also a member of Wales’s nationalist party, Plaid Cymru.

But as the bite of the recession grows worse and the need for help from the south becomes more acute, such a view is distinctly a minority one.

“It’s good to be part of the United Kingdom,” said Glenys Lloyd, a local inn owner. “I was born in Wales, but in the end I’m British, aren’t I?”

mercredi 25 janvier 2012

trade gap between US and China...

iPadded

The trade gap between America and China is much exaggerated

AMERICA’S trade deficit with China hit another record last year. Estimated at almost $300 billion, it made up over 40% of America’s total deficit. Yet official data grossly overstate US imports from China.

Take the iPad, which America imports from China even though it is entirely designed and owned by Apple, an American company. iPads are assembled in Chinese factories owned by Foxconn, a Taiwanese firm, largely from parts produced outside China. According to astudy by the Personal Computing Industry Centre, each iPad sold in America adds $275, the total production cost, to America’s trade deficit with China, yet the value of the actual work performed in China accounts for only $10. Using these numbers, The Economist estimates that iPads accounted for around $4 billion of America’s reported trade deficit with China in 2011; but if China’s exports were measured on a value-added basis, the deficit was only $150m.

The chart shows a geographical breakdown of the retail price of an iPad. The main rewards go to American shareholders and workers. Apple’s profit amounts to about 30% of the sales price. Product design, software development and marketing are based in America. Add in the profits and wages of American suppliers, and distribution and retail costs, and America retains about half the total value of an iPad sold there. The next biggest gainers are South Korean firms like Samsung and LG, which provide the display and memory chips, whose profits account for 7% of an iPad’s value. The main financial benefit to China is wages paid to workers for assembling the product and for manufacturing some inputs—equivalent to only 2% of the retail price.

 Find out how much of an Apple iPhone is actually a Samsung with our "teardown" infographic

China’s small contribution to total costs suggests that a yuan appreciation would have little impact on its exports. A 20% rise in the yuan would add less than 1% to the import price of an iPad. For imports such as clothing and toys the Chinese value added is much higher. But electrical machinery and equipment, with more complex cross-border supply chains, make up one-quarter of China’s exports to America. Pascal Lamy, the head of the World Trade Organisation, has suggested that if trade statistics reflected true domestic content, America’s deficit with China might be more than halved.

mardi 24 janvier 2012

Mitt Romney's effective federal income tax rate in 2010 of 13.9 percent....

Romney’s Tax Returns Show $21.6 Million Income in ’10

Mitt Romney and his wife, Ann, made $27 million in 2010. They held millions of dollars in a Swiss bank account and millions more in partnerships in the Cayman Islands. His family’s trusts sold thousands of shares in Goldman Sachs that were offered to favored clients when the storied investment house first went public. The couple’s effective federal tax rate for the year worked out to 13.9 percent, a rate typical of households earning about $80,000 a year.

Emmanuel Dunand/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Mitt Romney delivered a speech on Tuesday morning at National Gypsum Company in Tampa, Fla. His campaign is calling it a "pre-buttal" to President Obama's State of the Union address.

Multimedia
The Election 2012 iPhone App

Election 2012 iPhone App

A one-stop destination for the latest political news — from The Times and other top sources. Plus opinion, polls, campaign data and video.

Readers’ Comments

"It's distressing that when we read about our public servants these days, it more often than not has to do with their private equities and not their service to the public. "
Argun, Brooklyn, NY

Yet the hundreds of pages of tax documents released by Mr. Romney’s campaign on Tuesday morning did not readily reveal any elaborate financial legerdemain or exotic tax shelters. What Mr. Romney’s returns illustrated, instead, was the array of perfectly ordinary ways in which the United States tax code confers advantages on the rich, allowing Mr. Romney to amass wealth under rules very different from those faced by most Americans who take home a paycheck.

Those differences leapt to the front of the national debate on Tuesday when President Obama — whose family’s income was less than a tenth of Mr. Romney’s in 2010 but whose effective federal rate was double — called for higher taxes on the wealthy in his State of the Union speech.

Mr. Romney’s tax returns were posted on his campaign’s Web site on Tuesday morning after escalating pressure from the other Republican candidates, Democrats and even supporters, some of whom attributed his loss in South Carolina’s Republican primary last weekend to his shifting and tentative responses to questions about his wealth, tax burden and overseas investments.

The 547 pages of documents included 2010 federal income tax returns for the Romneys, the couple’s estimated 2011 return and returns for their charitable foundation and two blind trusts established in their names, as well as a trust established for their children.

The couple paid about $3 million in federal taxes on an adjusted gross income of $21.6 million, the vast majority of it flowing from myriad of stock holdings, mutual funds and other investments, including profits and investment income from Bain Capital, the private equity firm Mr. Romney retired from in 1999.

The couple reported no wage earnings in 2010. But in a conference call with reporters on Tuesday, Mr. Romney’s campaign counsel, Benjamin L. Ginsberg, said that Mr. Romney and his wife collected more than $7 million worth of Bain profits in 2010.

That money — about a quarter of the couple’s income during the last two years — came in the form of so-called carried interest. It would be taxed not as deferred regular income, but at the lower 15 percent rate normally reserved for long-term capital gains, thanks to federal tax rules that have sparked intense debate in recent years.

Mr. Obama and others have argued that carried interest should be taxed at the rates which normally apply to income earned by people providing services, topping out at 35 percent. If Mr. Romney’s carried interest income in the last two years had been taxed at that higher rate, he would have owed about $4.8 million in federal taxes, roughly $2.6 million more than he would typically be assessed under current rules.

And like most of the wealthy, the Romneys paid only a tiny sliver of their income in payroll taxes, which cut heavily into the weekly paychecks of wage earners but is barely a blip on the returns of the rich. While payroll taxes eat up 6 percent of the income of Americans earning the national median income of $50,221, Mr. Romney and his wife paid just one-tenth of 1 percent of their income in payroll taxes.

Mr. Romney’s 2010 returns also suggest he may have paid far less taxes the previous year. The 2010 return shows the family made estimated tax payments for 2009 of $1,369,095. To avoid penalties, estimated tax payments must be at least 110 percent of the taxes owed the prior year. Assuming that is what he paid, his federal tax bill for 2009 would have been $1,244,632, far less than in 2010.

Mr. Romney and other Republican candidates have not only opposed higher taxes on the wealthy, but also favor maintaining or expanding the relatively low rates for capital gains and interest income, breaks that Republicans and others favor as a way to spur investment and reward risk-taking but which critics say have fed the growing wealth gap.

Those reductions in taxes on investments began with a deal between Bill Clinton, a Democrat, and Mr. Romney’s chief rival for the Republican nomination, Newt Gingrich, then speaker of the House. They accelerated under President George W. Bush, who cut taxes on dividends and capitals gains to their current levels, and survived a push by Mr. Obama and the Democratic majorities in Congress in 2010 to restrict tax advantages for financial managers. Indeed, if Mr. Romney became president and won approval of his own tax proposals he would pay less in federal taxes than he would under current law.

Mr. Gingrich has proposed even steeper reductions, which would nearly eliminate Mr. Romney’s federal income tax burden. During the 15-minute conference call, Mr. Ginsberg argued that the documents should settle any lingering questions about Mr. Romney’s investments and tax burden. Mr. Romney’s tax return was “complicated — and it is also fully transparent,” he said.

But the documents suggest that the Romneys or the lawyer overseeing the family’s blind trusts, R. Bradford Malt, may have been sensitive to the political implications of at least some aspects of the family’s finances.

In 2010, about $3 million of the family’s assets were held in a UBS bank account in Switzerland. Mr. Malt said that the account complied with all Internal Revenue Service reporting requirements and that the family had paid all applicable taxes on the interest earned by those assets.

“It is a bank account,” Mr. Malt said. “Nothing more, nothing less.”

But the account was closed in 2010, at a time when UBS was at the center of a Justice Department investigation regarding tax evasion by American clients.

Mr. Malt also said that the Romneys’ holdings in the Cayman Islands, Bermuda, Ireland and other low-tax countries did not provide any reduction in their United States taxes.

Bain Capital, as well as Mr. Romney’s I.R.A., have significant holdings in funds based in the Caymans and other low-tax countries. But Mr. Malt said that Mr. Romney’s income is taxed at the same rate it would be if the funds were in the United States.

The campaign declined repeatedly to answer questions about whether holding some of Mr. Romney’s retirement investments in overseas vehicles may have allowed him to avoid a levy known as the unrelated business income tax, or UBIT.

The Romneys’ family foundation, the Tyler Charitable Foundation, made gifts to more organizations in 2010 than it had previously. The largest amount paid that year, as in the past, went to the Mormon Church. Mr. Bush’s presidential library in Dallas received the second-largest grant, $100,000.

Mr. Romney, a Mormon, tithes a portion of his income to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. In 2010, his tithe appeared to include about $1.6 million in cash contributions.

Other assets held in the Romneys’ trusts were managed by Goldman Sachs, which invested the Romneys’ wealth in companies including Apple, Research in Motion and Comcast.

One notable sale Goldman made on the Romneys’ behalf in 2010 was 7,000 original public offering shares of Goldman Sachs, purchased in 1999.

The Goldman shares were issued at $53 each. The family trusts held onto those shares for more than a decade, as the firm prospered, but unloaded them in December 2010, at a time when the Goldman name had became synonymous with Wall Street excess and Mr. Romney was known to be considering a second bid for the White House.

The shares sold for around $161 apiece for a total price of about $1.13 million.

Floyd Norris, Stephanie Strom and Kevin Roose contributed reporting.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: January 24, 2012

A previous version of this article misstated the number of I.P.O. shares of Goldman Sachs that the Romneys bought in 1999; it was 7,000 shares, not 6,000. The article also misstated the share price and total when the shares were sold in 2010; the Romneys sold them for $161.45 apiece, or $1,130,123.87.

Que batalla se ha librado y ganado en el mundo diciendo estoy a favor del consenso?